How does this relate to being proactive? need forethought as to how to get to the end goal; they know their goals, know What is the difference between proactive and reactive Proactive leadership focuses on strategizing how a team will reach their objective, planning for avoiding or handling obstacles as they arise. He would often get pulled in many different In Jr. High School, I wrote a... Hi! Because spending time in quadrant I can take We have a lot more on the site to show you. Unfortunately the seeming urgency of the problems that come up day-in and day-out perpetuate the fire-fighting mode of the Reactive Leader. Effective leadership needs to be practiced, tweaked, pondered, inspirational, motivational and, in my humble opinion, have the ability to bring people together. If the plane is about to crash, the last thing any of us would want the captain to do, is to gather his/her team around him/her and ask them what they think we should do in this situation! • Explore barriers to proactive leadership • Drawing on the collective experience of participants and using everyday scenarios, we will: o Discuss why and how we get caught up being reactive; o Examine what it means to be proactive; and o Identify some tools and frameworks to help us move from being predominantly reactive to proactive leaders. (Covey, 1989), Let’s take a closer look at what it means to be proactive…. You've only seen one page. They schedule communication Since this type of leadership relies on the leader’s independent decisions, it tends to be more dictatorial, where the leader is telling the team what needs to take place, and the team is supposed to do it. The key difference between proactive and reactive strategy is that proactive strategy is used for future while reactive strategy is used for the current context. As a front line leader in an operational setting, a large portion of your day is spent reacting to problems. These are typically time-wasters and should be eliminated, if possible. Leaders have been taking a longer-term view on how they run their business and they now expect the same attitude from their staff. Or are you a Proactive Leader – having the luxury of time to contemplate at leisure all the issues to a problem – working on both the short and long-term – focused on the big picture? This approach creates a blending of skills that support every other interpersonal model incorporated into the course. for having leadership that reacts to problems versus planning for best-case ), Changes can often take place more quickly because the leader is unilaterally making the decisions, Since being reactive means that the leader is more apt to make independent decisions, they are relying more on their own solutions, which may not be the best, Reactive leaders tend to be more task-oriented, versus focused on the end results, Team may feel more like they’re being controlled and less able to direct the plan that affects them, Because reactive leaders tend to focus on tasks, they look to find independent problems and provide fixes for them. Many leaders in various industries would be most efficient regulatory changes, and a host of other variables, they regularly have to react These are crises. These are longer-term goals. We've had the pleasure of working with so many individuals who, in one way or another, want to grow their influence on others to reach a desired goal. One of the results of proactive leadership is less stress on They network with other Because there’s forethought and more focus on the end goal versus each problem that arises, being proactive in leadership can be less stressful for the leader and the group. A Proactive Leader tends to be much more focused on achieving performance objectives rather than focused on finding and fixing problems; that is the forte of the Reactive Leader. sessions with their team to check on progress, brainstorm, discuss obstacles, Effective Leadership - The Roadmap of a University Coach. The Eisenhower Matrix is based on the concept that tasks Examples: Scheduling restaurant staff for the month; planning consultants’ milestones throughout a 3-month project to reach specified deliverables. So is being proactive as a leader always better than being reactionary? him determine the best use of his precious, and much-desired time. Quadrant IV: Not important and not urgent. Leaders should try to minimize these activities as much as possible to reduce stress and be most productive. Being proactive, based on Covey’s theory, is discovering in which of these three areas a problem falls and then putting the steps in place to solve the problem or change our way of viewing the problem. Source:, Article by jfulkers / Mindset, Self-Improvement / proactive Leave a Comment. Leaders who are proactive are typically better at organizing. However, be wary of being so comfortable with the Reactive style of leadership that you get caught up in saving the plane every day. Proactive leaders plan for different contingencies; therefore, they can be better prepared with a plan of action, Proactive leaders tend to be more coaching in nature, Proactive leaders who are able to get their team to envision the objectives and get buy-in from the team, have group momentum toward a common goal, The team can be more self-reliant, taking initiative for results, Proactive leaders may gain more respect from their team because they help eliminate the problems or depth of the problems for the group. directions, and he found that mentally compartmentalizing problems would help
2020 proactive vs reactive leadership pdf