Not true. The book follows the traditional structure used by most intro physics books: from mechanics to modern physics. True, this is an integral calculus concept, but I have never found students to be troubled by it. The majority of the explanations are clear, but a few are awkwardly worded. There were some bolded terms (such as relativity) in Chapter 1, that I do not think should be bolded. One thing I was surprised to see was I think that has more weight of acceptance today. Excellent! example I found is in terms of references to television antennas, which are becoming less common. I found the structure of the text consistent throughout. Things I did not like: One drawback to this however is that there is a LOT of things covered that is impossible to cover in a 2 semester sequence. However, reference frame conventions are not always followed. The images were clear and well placed. It has pretty much everything i need (and then some!) This being a physics book makes this question rather irrelevant. It covers all topics typical to a college physics course. Seems that way, I could find no glaring inconsistencies. I do find this material interesting, but it is a definite extra that is very prevalent in the chapter questions as well as supporting chapters. No major errors or author bias are apparent with a quick first reading. In that time, I’ve had to work with half-a-dozen mainstream texts from publishing houses like Pearson and Wiley. It is hard to find topics that should be included in an introductory text such as this one that have been left out. The images could be of a better quality, compared to the standard Physics books the students paid $200+ for. This text covers all of the expected content in a College Physics course, encompassing both semesters, and includes several modern physics topics. However, it would be appropriate as a resource for problems or specific explanations.

In the section on acceleration (Chapter 2.4), there is a Misconception Alert on deceleration vs. negative acceleration. I am impressed with both the textbook and supplemental content available through Openstax. The textbook is comprehensive. More specifically, I have learned that OpenStax has worked with Sapling Learning to produce an online homework tool tailored for this book. Some glossary terms are a bit too succinct and as a result are oversimplified. As stated in other reviews, the modern physics information could be updated, but otherwise its an excellent text. The textbook is very comprehensive, covering all topics in a typical two-semester algebra-based introductory physics coruse. It is very consistent, each chapter has a similar structure, making it easier to read as you go along as you learn what to expect. Students have not complained that the textbook is "hard to read" any more than with other textbooks I have used. However I must note that on my Mac, some lines in the pdf are irregularly spaced. Next time I adopt this book, I would make a "sub textbook" by collating and printing only the pages I need. Reviewed by Joseph Eccles, Adjunct Assistant Professor, Raritan Valley Community College on 4/13/20, I am looking at this text from the viewpoints of both a two semester algebra-based physics course for engineering majors and a one-semester algebra course aimed at students in medical and technology and technology programs. Reviewed by Darrell Lim, Faculty, Portland Community College on 6/20/17, The book covers what’s to be expected in college-level physics, with some sections being rather bare, yet factual. Electromagnetic Induction, AC Circuits, and Electrical Technologies, 32. The book can also be easily updated by adding new relevant examples as new technologies appear. Our interest in the book is for our algebra based physics sequence. 23.36 c. Much of the data is presented in a tabular format, an associated graphical representation would be useful. Reviewed by Eric Mandell, Lecturer, Bowling Green State University on 2/1/18, This text covers all of the expected content in a College Physics course, encompassing both semesters, and includes several modern physics topics. Images try to be inclusive of various ethnicities. Each chapter starts with the learning objectives followed by an introduction to the basic concepts with examples, and ends with applications. But the text is very male centric I noticed on a second look. I also did not notice significant representation of persons with disabilities. On page 640 the statement “the force that surrounds an object” is not correct. 26 where the Square Kilometre Array is discussed in a way that does not appear technically correct to this radio astronomer.

,

The authors have done a fantastic job of realizing this can be a way to introduce content to students. My students seemed comfortable reading it online. I may create a customized version for that course. The text is structured in a way that will simplify changes moving forward. Most other physics textbooks provide a rating for each end-of-chapter question (I, II, III) as a rough estimate of the question's difficulty. Photographs and figures of people seem to include people of all races and genders. read more,

Students have informed me that they have referred to this text in other... However, many of them performed badly in the course. Very well done. read more. read more. There is an unfortunate tendency to use technical terms in the introductions to chapters or sections before they have been defined. Since the later material is not gotten to in most classes, whether additions are made in the future or not will not impact the usability of the book. As regards comprehensiveness, Openstax’s College Physics compares favourably with these texts. The thoughts are not compartmentalized, they are more of a lecture-style explanation rather than solid, clear-cut description of the material. I didn’t find the textbook outdated or inappropriate in any way, although, I did not find a variety of cultural specific questions. However, I found that the numerical problems at the end of this book are not as varied as compared to other standard textbooks. I didn’t find any gaps in content. However, I question whether it is prudent to graduate our students without knowing what “e” means. Most figures themselves are clear and of good size, but some are a bit cluttered and small, ex. The book covers typical topic for college physics. The topics are presented in the typical order (from mechanics to modern physics) and it is easy to access and find different topics with the search tool and the glossary.

2020 best college physics textbook